Epistemicism about Vagueness and Meta - Linguistic Safety
نویسنده
چکیده
§
منابع مشابه
Epistemically Vague Boundaries without Margins of Error
I propose to give a solution to the sorites paradox with respect to monadic predicates expressing sensible qualities that is squarely within the epistemicist camp of Williamson (1994, 1996), Sorenson (1988, 2001), and Rescher (2009). In particular, I will address what appears to be the Achilles’ heel of that account: namely, the problem of giving a plausible story about how an exact boundary ar...
متن کاملEpistemicism, Parasites and Vague Names Nov 8
John Burgess has recently argued that Timothy Williamson’s attempts to avoid the objection that his theory of vagueness is based on an untenable metaphysics of content are unsuccessful. Burgess’s arguments are important, and largely correct, but there is a mistake in the discussion of one of the key examples. In this note I provide some alternative examples and use them to repair the mistaken s...
متن کاملOn the edge of the abyss.
In this paper I provide a different justification for a margin for error principle for vagueness centred on the idea of sorites susceptibility. This justification can provide an alternative basis for an epistemicist theory of vagueness, and, alternatively, could be used to ground a form of agnosticism about vagueness alternative and incompatible to Wright (2003b). I argue that we should prefer ...
متن کاملFuzzy Epistemicism∗
It is taken for granted in much of the literature on vagueness that semantic and epistemic approaches to vagueness are fundamentally at odds. If we can analyze borderline cases and the sorites paradox in terms of degrees of truth, then we don’t need an epistemic explanation. Conversely, if an epistemic explanation suffices, then there is no reason to depart from the familiar simplicity of class...
متن کاملVagueness and Ambivalence
What is the proper attitude toward what is expressed by a vague sentence in the face of borderline evidence? Many call this attitude “ambivalence” and distinguish it from uncertainty. It has been argued that Classical Epistemicism and classical probability theory fail to characterize this attitude, and that we must therefore abandon classical logic or classical probabilities in the presence of ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008